King Charles III and his wife, Queen Camilla, traveled to Kenya for a four-day trip, where he met with members of the government, visited multiple organizations, and delivered a speech where he brushed off Britain’s legacy of colonialism and slavery.
While visiting the African country, King Charles has been thinking about the affairs of the British monarchy. He seems to be mulling over some moves that would radically reshuffle the monarchy and push Prince Harry and Meghan Markle deeper into oblivion while at it.
It appears that His Majesty is open to the idea of bringing Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie in as working royals.
With the departure of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, the majority of working seniors are over 70 years of age, and according to royal experts, King Charles needs help.
Veteran author and commentator Richard Eden said that King Charles and The Firm should start “hiring” and Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie are more than qualified.
He wrote in the Daily Mail: “As I have watched the King and Queen carry out engagements in East Africa, what has struck me most is that they need help. If we want the monarchy to continue to be as strong as it was under the late Queen, we need recruits to the Firm.”
He insisted that having the two sisters would greatly benefit the monarchy. He explained: “King Charles should ask his sensible nieces, Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie if they would like to become working royals. I know they have a great sense of duty, so they would be likely to agree. A Commonwealth realm that does not expect to see the new monarch in a hurry would, I’m sure, welcome a visit from one of his nieces.”
Royal historian Dr. Ed Owens believed that Prince Harry’s memoir Spare destroyed his ties to his father and the monarchy “beyond repair.”
The bombshell memoir has indeed pushed King Charles to “radically re-imagine and reshuffle” his reign, “leaving Prince Harry and Markle in the dirt.”
He said: “The story is a slightly tragic one as it has damaged this idea of a family monarchy. This idea is that this is a united group who embody, if you like, the best of British family life.”
Owens continued: “Originally King Charles III’s reign was going to be based around him being supported by his two trusty lieutenants — William and Harry. But when that went so disastrously wrong in early 2020 because of Harry and Meghan’s decision to leave Britain, it really put paid to that vision of the family monarchy.”
He also added: “And then of course we’ve had the Sussexes airing their dirty laundry in public for the best part of three years — and again it has done much damage to that narrative of happy family life. King Charles is uniquely placed because he knows first-hand that the ideal of the family rarely matches the reality of the family monarchy.”
The California residents now need a backup plan.
