On May 6, Camilla, Queen Consort, and King Charles III are expected to be crowned during a lavish event at Westminster Abbey in front of thousands of high-profile royals, politicians, and other dignitaries.
In one of Prince Harry‘s many interviews, he was asked if he and his wife, Meghan Markle, would attend King Charles’s coronation ceremony.
Prince Harry, Markle, and their daughter, Lilibet Diana, should stay in their California mansion to celebrate Archie‘s birthday because the state ceremony that the world has been waiting for over 70 years might be in peril.
According to a royal expert and scholar, Anthony Holden, King Charles’s humongous and historical event might be in trouble because of a massive confession — no, not the one about wanting to be Camilla, Queen Consort’s tampon.
King Charles has admitted to behaving inappropriately as a married man who made a vow to his wife.
Appearing in a documentary about his life, King Charles was asked if he was unfaithful to his wife, Princess Diana.
In 1994, King Charles was asked if he “remained true to her,” and he responded: “Yes, yes… Until it became irretrievably broken down, us both having tried.”
Via his biographer, King Charles confirmed that he was already having a lustful affair with Camilla Parker Bowles by 1986. King Charles and his late wife split in 1992.
According to royal biographer Anthony Holden, King Charles’s salacious confession of adultery could spark a “constitutional crisis.”
Via The Mirror and The Guardian, Holden said that King Charles’s unacceptable deeds as a spouse and future head of the monarchy could require some major changes in his coronation oath that have the potential to lead to a constitutional crisis.
The royal expert said: “The Church of England has never crowned a divorced man as King, let alone one who has publicly confessed to adultery – with the relevant woman expecting to be crowned Queen Consort. The late Robert Runcie [the former Archbishop of Canterbury] told me this would require a revision of the coronation oath, which would require a new statute of Parliament.”
He added: “Given the convention that Parliament does not debate the monarchy without the monarch’s consent, this would require the Prime Minister to seek King Charles’s permission. This, Runcie told me, would amount to a constitutional crisis.”
Holden’s claims were contradicted by another expert. Sir Vernon Bogdanor, a research professor at King’s College London’s Centre for British Politics and Government, did an interview with The Mail on Sunday to say that Camilla, Queen Consort, and King Charles’s marriage annul all the potential troubles at the coronation.
He stated: “Charles and Camilla’s wedding was followed by a Service of Prayer and Dedication led by Archbishop Rowan Williams. This surely overrides anything Robert Runcie may or may not have said.”
King Charles’s past obscene confessions make Prince Harry look innocent, and his revelations in Spare laughable.
