Furious backers of the British royal family say there is one Lilibet, the late Queen Elizabeth II. It was her name; she invented it when she was just a toddler because she could not say Elizabeth properly.
The Queen was called by that pet name by her father and husband — these were the only two people on this planet who used the name Lilibet.
Her Majesty insisted that the castles, paintings, and billions of pounds were not hers, but her childhood name was all she possessed in this world.
A new book by royal writer and biographer Robert Hardman explained that Queen Elizabeth had been “as angry as I’d ever seen her” when Prince Harry and Meghan Markle named their baby daughter, Lilibet.
The Daily Mail said the late Queen quipped: “I don’t own the palaces; I don’t own the paintings; the only thing I own is my name. And now they’ve taken that.”
According to the book, Prince Harry and Markle think differently; it is claimed that the pair had no scruple going against the furious Queen’s desire and named their child Lilibet.
The duo even threatened to sue anyone who pushed back against their story that Queen Elizabeth agreed to this name fiasco. It seems that King Charles III and the rest of the Royal family may have found a way to defend the Queen’s name against Prince Harry and Markle’s drama.
According to royal expert Neil Sean, the Royal Family has yet to write anything about Lilibet on the Royal Family website, and there are few theories as to why.
The Fox News contributor revealed: “But now, if you head over to the succession page on the Royal website, you will notice that there’s absolutely nothing about Princess Lily. Yes, there’s her name, and you know the level of where she would be in the line of succession, but unlike, for instance, Prince Archie, there’s nothing about her, so naturally, I went into some investigation mode and contacted some very excellent sources and said, You know well, where is the info? There’s plenty of info about the weight, the birth, and all that sort of stuff about Prince Archie and the story that came back was simply that they don’t have any information; they have requested information on several occasions, and as ever, we have to say allegedly.”
He added that there is some mystery surrounding the lack of information on the little girl. He concluded by: “The website is visited by millions of people every year you can only benefit from being on a website like this but then why on Earth if you’re so proud of course of your children would you not want to include certain things for one child and remove them from the other this is certainly something of a mystery for those inside Palace walls because.”
While some believe Prince Harry and Markle are keeping all information private to protect their daughter, others say that is a quiet way to shed light on only one Lilibet – the original one who ruled over England for seventy years.
A sly King Charles might have found a smart and discreet way to defend his mother’s name while making Prince Harry and Markle look bad.
In my opinion there should not be anything about either of the so called children of harry and megan until there
is a DNA test carried out on both of the children and of harry and megan to prove that they are entitled to royal status because if both the parents don’t show up on the tests of the children then they are no different from you or me as far as royal status is concerned